[Summary] Why Will the Dollar Become Stronger? U.S. Intentions Seen in the Stablecoin Law and Japan’s Four Discussion Points

(Original article in Japanese was published for FinTech Journal on July,30, 2025 by Makoto Shibata)https://www.sbbit.jp/article/fj/168793


The recently enacted GENIUS ACT, a comprehensive stablecoin regulation in the United States, has sparked global interest due to its potential impact on financial markets and international monetary dynamics. While Japan led the world in creating legal frameworks for stablecoins, it now finds itself lagging in actual implementation. This article explores the content and significance of the new U.S. legislation, its potential consequences for the global financial system, and the four key areas Japan must re-evaluate moving forward.


Overview of the GENIUS ACT: U.S. Stablecoin Law

Background and Definition

The GENIUS ACT was passed with bipartisan support, approved by the U.S. Senate on June 17, 2025, and by the House of Representatives on July 17, 2025, before being signed into law by President Trump. The law defines stablecoins as digital assets backed by highly liquid reserves such as U.S. dollars, short-term U.S. Treasuries, or central bank deposits, and redeemable at face value.

Issuer Qualifications and Regulatory Standards

Only financial institutions authorized by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) or federally licensed non-bank issuers are permitted to issue stablecoins. The law imposes strict requirements, including:

  • Full reserves backing all issued coins
  • Publicly disclosed redemption policies
  • Monthly reserve disclosures
  • Prohibition of rehypothecation (reuse of collateral)
  • Criminal penalties for false disclosures
  • Adherence to capital, liquidity, and risk management standards
  • Compliance with AML and sanctions regulations
  • Priority claims for users in case of issuer bankruptcy

Supervisory Scope and Timeline

Issuers with over $10 billion in circulation must be federally supervised, while smaller issuers may be overseen at the state level. Full enforcement begins in November 2026, and from July 2028, the sale of unauthorized stablecoins will be prohibited.


Three Global Impacts of the U.S. Stablecoin Law

1. Increased Demand for U.S. Treasuries

By institutionalizing U.S. Treasuries—particularly short-term notes—as reserve assets for stablecoins, demand for Treasuries is expected to rise. Currently, stablecoin issuers already hold around $182 billion in U.S. short-term Treasuries, equivalent to the holdings of countries like South Korea and the UAE. Approximately 99% of these reserves are controlled by Tether and Circle, potentially shifting U.S. debt market dynamics.

2. Strengthening the Dollar’s Position in Global Finance

Stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar offer low transaction costs, price stability, and real-time settlement, making them attractive for cross-border remittances and value storage—especially in emerging markets. This could accelerate the global use of the U.S. dollar and reinforce America’s financial presence internationally.

3. Strategic Approach to CBDCs

Rather than pushing for a government-issued Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the U.S. now appears to embrace private-sector stablecoins as strategic tools to uphold the dollar’s global dominance. This pivot positions stablecoins as functional substitutes for a digital dollar, particularly as alternatives like China’s digital yuan remain limited and Europe continues to delay CBDC implementation.


Four Critical Issues Japan Must Revisit

Although Japan revised its Payment Services Act in 2022 to regulate stablecoins ahead of the U.S., implementation has been sluggish. The following four points merit urgent attention:

1. Regulatory Operations and Speed

Japan’s approval process for stablecoin businesses can take over two years, with the first U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin service only launched in March 2025. No Japanese yen stablecoin is operational yet, highlighting the need for more agile regulatory procedures.

 (JPYC Inc. was granted a license to issue stablecoin after this article was published and expected to issue Japanese Yen stablecoin in few months time.)

2. Flexibility in Reserve Asset Requirements

Current Japanese rules on reserve composition, transparency, and maturity limits restrict stablecoin structures. This makes it difficult for yen stablecoins to contribute meaningfully to global demand for U.S. Treasuries—a gap Japan may need to close through regulatory loosening.

3. Involvement of Financial Institutions

Unlike the U.S., where banks are explicitly expected to issue stablecoins, Japan faces hurdles such as unclear capital regulations and concerns over competition with bank deposits. It’s time to clearly define stablecoins as distinct “payment currencies” and encourage financial institutions to participate through measures like relaxed capital requirements.

4. International Cooperation and Cross-Border Frameworks

The U.S. law allows foreign issuers to sell stablecoins domestically, laying the groundwork for mutual recognition systems. Japan should also develop a cross-border acceptance framework, aligning with international rules and supporting the global use of yen-pegged stablecoins. In the long term, Japan needs a strategic approach to enhance the yen’s international presence through digital assets.


Conclusion

The enactment of the GENIUS ACT marks a major step in the U.S.’s stablecoin strategy—one that could reshape global finance, boost demand for U.S. Treasuries, and reinforce the dollar’s international dominance. For Japan, this signals an urgent need to rethink its regulatory approach and strengthen its digital currency ecosystem. While Japan was early to legislate, faster implementation, international coordination, and active market engagement will be essential to stay relevant in the evolving global digital finance landscape.

9/2 AI Trends and Market Insights from Former OpenAI and ex-a16z Partners

Recently, the rapid evolution of AI has become a hot topic across various industries, leading to the emergence of numerous AI startups. Investment in this field continues to grow worldwide. To coincide with the visit of a venture fund manager from the United States — a leading country in AI innovation — we are hosting this seminar to provide valuable insights into the latest technological trends and market developments. We warmly invite you to join us for this opportunity.

◆Date :2025/9/2 18:00-20:30(Doors open at 17:45)
◆Venue :FINOLAB Event Space
      Otemachi Building 4F, 1-6-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Note: The Otemachi Building is long from east to west, and the entrance is located at the east end, on the Tokyo Station side.  
◆Language:English
◆Fee :¥1,000  
◆Organizer:FINOLAB/BEENEXT Global AI Initiative


◆Agenda :
18:00₋18:05 Opening
18:05-19:05 Presentations: “AI Trends and Market Insights from Former OpenAI and ex-a16z Partners”
          Jay Zhao / Jenny Xiao(Leonis Capital)
          Talal Attieh / Cameron Porter(Steel Atlas)
          Sumeet Singh(Worldbuild)
19:05-19:25  Q&A
19:25-19:30    Closing
19:30:-20:30 Networking

◆Speaker Profiles (in alphabetical order by affiliation, titles omitted)

Jay Zhao 
Leonis Capital, Founder General Partner

Previously worked with funds such as T Fund, Walden, and Granite Ventures. He has also served on the boards of companies including Morqeta, HireVue, Mixamo, and Sense.

Jenny Xiao 
Leonis Capital, Partner

Former OpenAI researcher. Leveraging her expertise in AI research, she has invested extensively in early-stage U.S. startups. Holds a Ph.D. in AI and Economics from Columbia University.


Talal Attieh
Steel Atlas, General Partner

Former investor at Palantir and Flexport. Focuses on a venture capital fund specializing in software and hardware that drive transformation in industrial sectors.


Cameron Porter
Steel Atlas, General Partner

Previously with AlleyCorp, focusing on R&D and investments. Has experience both as a professional soccer player in the U.S. Major League Soccer and as an engineer.

 
Sumeet Singh
Worldbuild GP

Former partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). Has made numerous investments, including in the U.K. fintech decacorn, Revolut.


  

Please note that the lecture content and program are subject to change without prior notice.

Photos & Videos
Photos and videos will be taken during the event and may be published on media websites, YouTube, and other online platforms. If you have any concerns about having your face or voice appear online, please inform us on the day of the event.
If we do not receive a request, we will assume you consent to such use. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation.


Handling of Personal Information
Your registration information will be managed in accordance with Peatix Japan Inc.’s Privacy Policy and may be shared with FINOLAB Inc., which operates FINOLAB. For FINOLAB’s privacy policy, please refer here.


Event Information
By registering for this event, you may also receive information about future FINOLAB-hosted or FINOLAB-organized events via the email address you provided. If you prefer not to receive such emails, please let us know. If we do not receive a request, we will assume your consent. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

FINOLAB Member JPYC Becomes the First in Japan to Issue Japanese Yen-Denominated Stablecoin After Obtaining Fund Transfer Service Provider Registration

FINOLAB member company, JPYC Inc., has announced a major milestone, becoming the first in Japan to issue a Japanese Yen-denominated stablecoin after obtaining its Fund Transfer Service Provider registration.

On August 18, 2025, JPYC Inc. was officially registered as a “Fund Transfer Service Provider” (Registration No. Kanto Local Finance Bureau 00099) under the Payment Services Act.

This registration makes JPYC the first entity of its kind in Japan authorized to issue an electronic payment instrument (stablecoin) pegged 1:1 with the Japanese Yen.

You can read the full press release (in Japanese) here:

https://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000274.000054018.html

[Summary] Understanding the Regulatory Boundary Between Advance Payment Services and Lending in Japan | Fintech Topics #118

(Original Video in Japanese was published on the FINOLAB CHANNEL on Jul. 15, 2025 by Makoto Shibata)

As the fintech industry continues to evolve, a new question is gaining prominence in Japan: when does an advance payment service cross the line and become a regulated money lending activity under the Money Lending Business Act? In this article, this complex issue is broken down using recent discussions, regulatory updates, and illustrative case studies.

What Are “Advance Payment Services”?

Advance payment services involve a third-party provider making a payment on behalf of a user, with the expectation of reimbursement later. Examples include:

  • Salary advance services
  • Bill payment proxy services (e.g. for phone or utility bills)
  • Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) models
  • Business payment platforms

The key regulatory question: Do such services legally count as “lending”?

Why Is This Now a Regulatory Focus?

The surge in new fintech models—particularly in e-commerce and digital payment ecosystems—has blurred the lines between payment facilitation and lending. This has led to:

  • Ambiguity in legal interpretation: It’s often unclear if such services fall under lending regulations.
  • Increased regulatory inquiries: The Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan has received more queries, prompting clarification through working groups and public guidance.
  • Innovation outpacing legal framework: New business models often don’t fit existing definitions, creating gray areas that need clarification.

Regulatory Clarification from the FSA

In April 2025, the FSA released a Q&A on Advance Payment Services and Their Applicability to Lending Regulations, following discussions within the Financial System Council.

Key criteria introduced:

  1. Economic Substance Over Form
    If the transaction has the same economic impact as a loan, it may be considered lending, regardless of contract terms.
  2. Professional Intent
    If the service is offered continuously and intentionally, it may be considered a “business” under the law.
  3. Profit Motive and Scope
    Services aren’t automatically exempt just because they don’t target the general public or charge fees.
  4. Exemptions
    Certain activities by banks or specific business operators under other laws may be excluded.

Two Key Evaluation Axes

When judging whether a service constitutes lending, two key factors are considered:

  • Creditworthiness Assessment: Does the provider assess the user’s ability to repay or base conditions (fees, limits) on credit scores?
  • Financial Risk Transfer: Is there substantial risk transferred to the provider, or is the reimbursement nearly guaranteed?

Case Studies: Lending or Not?

The FSA provided real-world examples:

Salary Advance Services → Not Lending

  • Based on actual work performed
  • Employer, not employee, bears service fee
  • No repayment obligation for employees
  • Short-term and limited in scope

Medical Expense Advance During School Trips → Not Lending

  • Small, limited scope
  • No credit scoring
  • Repayment only of actual cost, not profit-based

Freelancer Bill Payment Proxy with Monthly Repayment → Considered Lending

  • Users repay with fees
  • Risk assessed based on income
  • Operates on a recurring basis
  • Requires registration under lending laws

Employer Payroll Payment Agency → Not Lending

Implications for Fintech Innovators

  • Acts as part of payroll processing
  • No interest, no credit judgment
  • No repayment by employees

As interest rates rise and new services proliferate, clarity around whether a business model constitutes lending is more important than ever. The FSA’s recent actions show that regulators are becoming more proactive, offering frameworks and case-based interpretations to support innovation while maintaining consumer protection.

For entrepreneurs and developers, understanding these boundaries is crucial to designing compliant services from the start.

Final Thoughts

Advance payment services are now a hot topic in fintech compliance. The FSA has laid the groundwork for clearer interpretation, focusing on credit evaluation and economic substance. Going forward, these frameworks will help innovators navigate legal risk while contributing to a more sophisticated financial ecosystem.